Assessment
of Patient Satisfaction on Nursing Services at Obstetrical and Gynaecological Unit of Selected Hospital, Coimbatore.
P. Yasodha*
College of Nursing, Sri Ramakrishna Institute of Paramedical
Sciences, Coimbatore - 641044.
*Corresponding Author E-mail: yasodhagopi@gmail.com
ABSTRACT:
Patient
satisfaction with nursing care is considered to be an important factor in
explaining patient’s perceptions of service quality. Nursing care is one of the
major components of Health Care Services. Thus, patients have the right to
expect quality of nursing care because nursing staff comprises the vast
majority among hospital staff and have the greatest contact with patients. The
study was conducted to assess the patient satisfaction on nursing services at
obstetrical and gynaecological unit of selected
hospital, Coimbatore. The design chosen was descriptive design and purposive
sampling was used to select the participants. A total number of 20 mothers were
included in this study. Structure Questionnaire was used to assess the patient
satisfaction of nursing services. Descriptive statistical analysis was used and
the results showed that 60 percentages of mothers were well satisfied with
nursing services provided in the obstetrical and gynaecological
unit of selected hospital, Coimbatore.
KEYWORDS: Patient
satisfaction, nursing care, quality service.
INTRODUCTION:
The
goal of any service in an organization is creation of satisfaction among
customers. The customers’ opinion of services is being taken into account in
assessments of quality. Thus, evaluating the quality of medical care involves
the measurement of its benefits to patients and the community at large. There
has been increasing interest in patient’s satisfaction with nursing care in the
past few decades; patient satisfaction with nursing care is considered an
important factor in explaining patients perceptions of
service quality (Comley and DeMeyer,
2001)
The
concept of patient satisfaction is rapidly changing to customers’ delight which
means the patient is not only cured of his alignment during the hospital but
also pleasured with the care provided to him by the hospital staff during the
stay which he fondly remembers after being discharged.
Satisfaction
is the psychological state that results from confirmation or disconfirmation of
expectations with reality. Stimson and Webb (1975) have suggested that
satisfaction is related to perception of the outcome of care and the extent to
which it meets patient expectations.
Pascoae
(1983) defined patient satisfaction as “a health care recipient’s reaction to
salient aspects of the context, process, and result of their service
experience.” Patient’s satisfaction with nursing care is defined as the
patient’s opinion of the care received from nursing staff and is acknowledged
as an outcome indicator of the quality of nursing care (Jafar
and Muayyad, 2003).
Caring
activities said to be essential for human survival and development (Skott and Lundgren 2006). Caring has been widely discussed in
the health care professions especially in nursing which is considered to be one
of the caring professions (Boykin and Schoenkofer,
2001).
Patient’s
are the best source of information about a hospital system’s communication,
education and pain management processes and they are the only source of
information about whether they were treated with dignity and respect. Their
experiences often reveal how well a hospital system is operating and can
stimulate important insights into the kinds of changes that are needed to close
the chasm between the care provided and the care that should be provided
(Michael et al., 2004).
Patients
should be allowed to define their own priorities and evaluate their care
accordingly, rather than having those criteria selected by professionals (David
and David, 1978).
Unlike
clinical process measures, which are strictly facility centered, patient
satisfaction is a “patient centered” process measure. It reflects the patient’s
personal response to, and evaluation of care (as opposed to the hospitals view
of what is appropriate). Patient satisfaction is the only available measure of
the personal impact of the full spectrum of the care process (Irwin, 2000).
OBJECTIVES:
To
assess the patient satisfaction on nursing services at obstetrical and gynaecological unit of selected hospital, Coimbatore.
HYPOTHESIS:
H1:
Patients are satisfied with nursing care provided in the obstetrical and
gynecological unit of selected hospital,
Coimbatore.
REVIEW OF LITERATURE
Wolf
et al., (2003) conducted a correlational study aimed
at examining the relationship between cardiac patients (n=73) reports of nurse
caring and satisfaction with nursing care. A moderately strong relationship
between caring and satisfaction was found. The researchers commented that,
since caring is considered fundamental to the nature of nursing, practicing
nurses must appreciate its connection to outcomes such as patient satisfaction.
The
work of Oleni et al., (2004) revealed Nursing Care at
night. The aim of the study was to evaluate nursing care provided at night from
the perspective of both nurses and patients. A total number of 178 nurses on
night duty were consecutively selected, while the patients (n=386) were
selected by convenience sampling. The results showed a statistically
significant difference between nurses’ assessments and patients’ perceptions of
the nursing care provided at night in nursing interventions. In the areas of
medical interventions and evaluation no statistically significant, differences
were found between nurses and patients.
A
cross sectional study was conducted by Rafii et al.,
(2007) to determine the relationship between patients’ reports of nurse caring
and patient satisfaction with nursing care. The study was conducted among 250
patients who were hospitalized for medical conditions or surgical procedures.
The findings indicated a statistically significant relationship between patient
reports of nurse caring and satisfaction with nursing care than female
patients. Admissions to hospital during the last five years were positively
corrected with patients’ perceptions of nurse caring and satisfaction with
nursing care.
A
national level literature review done by Ozsoy et
al., (2007) on patient expectations and satisfaction with nursing care. The
researchers reviewed 3089 articles. The results of this study are divided in to
two categories, expectations concerning “nursing care”, and “satisfaction with
nursing care”. The findings show that there exist conceptual and philosophic
deficiencies in the approaches to patient satisfaction and that there is a need
to use standardized instruments to study and assess patient satisfaction in
future.
MATERIAL AND METHODS USED FOR THE STUDY:
There
is no specific tool by which one can measure quality of services in medical services, however the
level of satisfaction of patient about the hospital services can be considered
an important tool of quality services .The patients satisfaction is an
increasing assessing tool for measurement of quality services and this can be
used a positive feedback systematically to choose between alternative methods
of organizing or providing health care to the masses. This study was conducted
in Sri Ramakrishna hospital, Coimbatore. A total number of 20 participants were
selected by purposive sampling method. Questionnaire was developed and
responses collected from the patients directly. The patient satisfaction
questionnaire contain 15 questions which has been grouped into 4 domains such
as,
1. Physical care
2. Duration of care
3. Nursing skill
4. Interpersonal relationship
The
participants’ satisfaction on Nursing Care services was assessed through
structured Interview Questionnaire
from the 3rd day of hospital stay in OBG unit. Oral concern was
obtained and then structured Interview Questionnaire was given to the
participants. After fulfilling that questionnaire, all the participants are
requested to return the same Questionnaire. Grading was done by researcher in
order to know the level of participants’ satisfaction on nursing care services.
Descriptive statistics was used to find out the results.
RESULTS AND
DISCUSSION:
In
the domain of physical care, 75 percentage of mothers verbalized that they were
well satisfied which with the privacy was maintained during physical care. 50 percentages
of mothers were verbalized that routine checkup was well satisfied and 45
percentage of mothers felt well satisfaction with nurses’ help during physical
care.
In
the domain of duration of care, 75 percentage of mothers were well satisfied
with the time spend by the nurses for giving care. 55 percentages of the
mothers felt well satisfied with the availability of staff, verbalized that the
nurses were responded immediately to their call in the obstetrical and gynaecological unit.
In
the domain of nursing skill, most of the mothers (65%) felt well satisfied with
the attentive attitude of the nurses to their needs. 50 percentage of mothers
felt that nurses were identified their needs and problems correctly.
Among
20 mothers, 5 percentages of mothers moderately satisfied with nurses awareness
on their needs, 45 percentage of mothers felt satisfied where as another 45
percentage felt well satisfied and 5 percentage of them expressed that nurse’s
awareness were excellent.
In
the domain of interpersonal relationship, 65 percentage of mothers well
satisfied with the listening skill of the nurses and involvement of the family
members in teaching, 60 percentage of mothers were well satisfied with the
health education given by the nurses, 55 percentage of mothers were well
satisfied with the explanation provided by the nurses during care and 50
percentage of mothers were well satisfied with the communication between nurses
and themselves.
While
considering the overall patient satisfaction on nursing care services, 15 percentages
of mothers felt satisfied and 60 percentage of mothers expressed they were well
satisfied with the care provided by the staff nurses. 25 percentages expressed
that nursing care was excellent.
REFERENCES:
1.
Comley, A., and Demeyer. D.
(2001). Assessing patient satisfaction with pain management through a
continuous quality improvement effort. Journal
of Pain and Symptom Management, 21, 27-40.
2.
Stimson, G., and Webb, B. (1975). Ongoing to see the doctor. Routledge and Kegan Paul, London.
http://sciencelinks.jp/j.east/article/200704
3.
Pascoae. (1993). The
correspondence of patient satisfaction and Nurse Burnout. Social Science and Medicine, 47, 1611-1617.
4.
Jafar, A. A., and Muayyad, M.
A. (2003). Patients’ satisfaction with nursing care in Jordon. International Journal of Health Care Quality
Assurance, 16, 279-285.
5.
Skott, C., and Lundgern, S.
(2006). The value of caring – episodes of desired change. International Journal of Human Caring, 10(1), 32-39.
6.
Boykin, A., and Schoenhofer, S. (2001).
Nursing as caring; a model of transforming practice, Jones and Bartlett: Boston
Massachusetts. USA.
7.
Michael, P. L., Phyllis, H., and Cindy, F. (2004). The correspondence
of patient satisfaction and nurse burnout. Social
science and medicine, 47, 1611-1677.
8.
David, L., and David, D. (1978). Therotical
and methodogical issues in sociological studies of consumer
satisfaction with medical care. Social
Science and Medicine, 12, 283-292.
9.
Irwin Press. (2000). The measure of Quality, Q Manage Health Care, 13, 2002-2009.
10. Wolf, Z., Miller, P., and
Devine, M. (2003). Relationship between nurse caring and patient satisfaction
in patients undergoing invasive cariac procedures. Medical Surgical Nursing, 12(6),
391-396.
11. Oleni, M., Johansson, P., Fridlund, B. (2004). Nursing care at night. Journal of Advanced Nursing, 47, 25-32.
12. Rafii, F., Hajinezhad,
M. E., and Haghani, H. (2007). Nursing caring in Iran
and its relationship with patient satisfaction. Australian Journal of Advanced Nursing, 26, 75-84.
13. Ozsoy, S. A., Ozgur,
G., and Akyol, A. D. (2007). Patient expectation and
satisfaction with nursing care in Turkey, “a literature review”. International Nursing Review, 54,
249-255.
Received on 23.12.2010 Modified
on 04.01.2011
Accepted
on 24.01.2011 © A&V Publication all
right reserved
Asian J. Nur. Edu. & Research 1(1): Jan.-March 2011; Page 03-05